<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: I2C Logic Analysis</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.nearfuturelaboratory.com/2008/05/29/logical-analysis/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.nearfuturelaboratory.com/2008/05/29/logical-analysis/</link>
	<description>Creating Implications</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 20 Nov 2008 16:51:54 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Georgi</title>
		<link>http://www.nearfuturelaboratory.com/2008/05/29/logical-analysis/#comment-17221</link>
		<dc:creator>Georgi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 19 Jul 2008 07:19:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nearfuturelaboratory.com/?p=2156#comment-17221</guid>
		<description>Hi,
Thank you for the comprehensive explaintion.
I use I2C for years, mainly on 8051 family MCUs because of the convenience to interface with many devices on the same bus. The protocol is really simple and robust - I never had trouble with it. The code is compact, so I use it even in small devices such as AT89C2051.
All I2C related routines are published on my site.
Hope you will find some useful idea.

Best Regards,
Georgi</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi,<br />
Thank you for the comprehensive explaintion.<br />
I use I2C for years, mainly on 8051 family MCUs because of the convenience to interface with many devices on the same bus. The protocol is really simple and robust - I never had trouble with it. The code is compact, so I use it even in small devices such as AT89C2051.<br />
All I2C related routines are published on my site.<br />
Hope you will find some useful idea.</p>
<p>Best Regards,<br />
Georgi</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
