<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: How can software be social?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.nearfuturelaboratory.com/2006/04/03/old203/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.nearfuturelaboratory.com/2006/04/03/old203/</link>
	<description>Creating Implications</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 01 Jul 2009 17:53:12 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Dumb software and social problems &#171; making the ordinary</title>
		<link>http://www.nearfuturelaboratory.com/2006/04/03/old203/comment-page-1/#comment-2776</link>
		<dc:creator>Dumb software and social problems &#171; making the ordinary</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Oct 2007 01:16:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-2776</guid>
		<description>[...] we mean by &#8220;technology&#8221; and also &#8220;social problem&#8221;. First, as Julian Bleecker points out, all software (and so, by extension, all technology) is social: Software is always social: any [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] we mean by &#8220;technology&#8221; and also &#8220;social problem&#8221;. First, as Julian Bleecker points out, all software (and so, by extension, all technology) is social: Software is always social: any [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
